ETA FinTech Policy Forum – Financial Services

ETA FinTech Policy Forum – Financial Services


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This note summarizes the federal regulator panels at ETA’s
annual FinTech Policy Forum, which was hosted by Venable in our
Washington, DC office. We provide key takeaways from the
discussions with (a) CFPB Director Rohit Chopra and (b)
representatives from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
the Federal Reserve, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
This note reflects our interpretation of the discussions and is
provided for informational purposes only.

Key Takeaways from CFPB Dir. Chopra Discussion:

  1. Data collection/use concerns remain at the top of the
    CFPB’s mind. Dir. Chopra is personally worried about harvesting
    of data and how that data can be used by tech companies.

  2. Dir. Chopra does not want to see the U.S. going down the road
    of a Chinese-like payments system in which one or a few major
    players (e.g., Alipay) dominate the markets; having multiple
    channels is preferred.

  3. Dir. Chopra is generally supportive of open banking, but does
    not think that the U.S. has the statutory framework in place to
    handle it from a regulatory perspective. When it comes to open
    banking, Dir. Chopra conceded that there is no legal authority for
    the CFPB to create a UK-style open finance system. In the fall,
    CFPB will complete rulemaking on customer data that will give
    customers control of how their data is used. Dir. Chopra worries
    about the creation of a “data underworld” where companies
    may try to grab data and use it for unrelated purposes.

  4. In the P2P payments context, the Bureau does not have a solid
    answer for whether liability should be shifted to the P2P platform
    for fraudulent transfers that were authorized, but Dir. Chopra
    indicated that P2P platforms with more resources at their disposal
    might be treated differently than those without a large bank or
    similar entity backing them. The CFPB is thinking about how
    ubiquitous one-time payments can be made in a way that addresses
    core issues (i.e., fraud). Chopra indicated that the Bureau might
    be thinking about the responsibility of the P2P apps working on the
    rails of a bank or other financial institution.

  5. The Bureau is trying to understand what it wants to do with
    BNPL. Dir. Chopra indicated that the Bureau may be using its
    supervisory authority in the near future to start answering some of
    its questions. Dir. Chopra indicated that the Bureau is starting to
    think about BNPL in the same manner in which it thinks about credit
    cards and that he thinks there should be some parity between the
    two products. When it comes to BNPL, the CFPB is looking at use of
    data, and how it might be used to induce more purchases and more
    borrowing. The “repeatability” of BNPL is the
    distinguishing feature of BNPL; credit card companies do not have
    nearly the same ability to influence transactions, according to
    Chopra

  6. Stablecoins are an interesting idea, but Dir. Chopra does not
    think that the U.S. is ready for them yet. In general, however,
    Dir. Chopra suggested that Washington’s obsession with crypto
    is hindering broader thinking on the entire payments
    ecosystem.

General Takeaways from Banking Regulator Panel:

Cryptocurrency

  1. All of the federal banking regulatory agencies are continuing
    to explore crypto risks and the role crypto plays in financial
    services.

  2. The OCC has gained significant knowledge in the crypto space
    and will continue to study the industry, including by outreach to
    individual banks where appropriate to do so.

  3. The OCC will continue to work on Interpretive Letter #1179
    process work and will continue clarifying when and how it is
    permissible for national banks to engage in certain cryptocurrency,
    distributed ledger, and stablecoin activities.

  4. The Federal Reserve is focused on crypto assets from a variety
    of perspectives (i.e., financial stability oversight); recent
    crypto market moves have shown the Fed that crypto assets are
    susceptible to a lot of the same risks as are traditional assets.
    The Fed issued a supervisory letter in August (press release)
    stating that the institutions the Fed supervises must notify the
    Fed of that activity before they engage in those activities
    (mirroring OCC’s 1179 process).

  5. The CFPB is focused on stablecoins/central bank digital
    currency; CFPB is primarily looking at assets where there is likely
    to be wide and robust consumer adoption.

Faster Payments

  1. The Bureau is concerned that with faster payments there are
    fewer “speedbumps,” which means a greater risk for fraud.
    The CFPB is thinking about safety and security in a real-time
    payments system (area of great focus).

Bank and FinTech Partnerships

  1. The OCC is focused on these partnerships; they are part of a
    larger theme in the strategic plan recently issued by the OCC of
    focusing on the digitalization of products and services;
    partnerships between banks and non-banks play a primary role in
    such digitization. The focus of partnerships needs to be on the
    basic blocking and tackling of compliance, including due diligence
    of partners, ongoing monitoring, consumer protection, customer
    service, and existing strategies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Finance and Banking from United States

Source link

Share This
COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.